Within thoughts, the fresh new Desk merchandise a very clear post on the inner consistencies given that really given that almost every other detailed analytics

It looks a little repetitive to have the reliabilities of each and every level getting Puerto Ricans and you will Mexicans listed in the language too as in Desk mode.

17. Have there been covariates available to evaluate racial/skin color variation because this was strongly related the latest discrimination strategies? Further, try county/geography checked-out once the California/Nyc expose so much more immigrant-good regulations versus Fl, etcetera. (e.g., Hatzenbuehler et al. data cited of condition immigration regulations and you may mental health).

RESPONSE: Usually the one competition goods regarding the dataset was not a helpful covariate towards establish sample, as 50% out-of Mexican immigrants failed to act (i.e., possibly refused or picked the fresh not familiar/zero response option) and you can regarding forty% from Puerto Ricans did not act. It seems that questionnaire points failed to sufficiently take of many participants’ conceptualizations of their racial label, which, we had been struggling to reliably gauge the impact regarding racial term or skin color.

You will find modified the end of the original part for the p

Predicated on the recommendations, we extra health insurance position, studies top, and you may societal assistance as covariates and you may updated the analyses.

You will find modified our limits point to explain the latest trials to help you which our research findings would be general. Eg, towards p. 29, we stated, “Very first, there have been numerous group constraints into study. Including, the fresh new try we made use of on the HCHS/SOL SCAS study try composed of Puerto Ricans and you can Mexicans produced outside the continental You.S.